There have been few biomechanical studies to clarify which size of a glenoid defect is critical. However, those studies have assumed that the defect occurred anteroinferiorly. Recent studies have reported that the defect is located anteriorly rather than anteroinferiorly. Therefore, the effect of the anterior, not anteroinferior, glenoid defect on shoulder stability needs to be investigated.
Hypothesis: The anterior glenoid defect would have a similar effect on anterior shoulder stability as that of the anteroinferior glenoid defect.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
The stability ratio without a defect (32% +/- 6%) significantly decreased after creating a 6-mm defect (17% +/- 5%; P = .0001), which was equivalent to 20% of the glenoid length.
An osseous defect at 3 o'clock with a width that was equal to or greater than 20% of the glenoid length significantly decreased anterior stability.
Clinical Relevance: The results suggest that reconstruction of the glenoid concavity might be necessary in shoulders with an anterior glenoid defect of at least 20% of the glenoid length.
Copyright remains with the authors and publisher.
There have been few biomechanical studies to clarify which size of a glenoid defect is critical. However, those studies have assumed that the defect occurred anteroinferiorly. Recent studies have reported that the defect is located anteriorly rather than anteroinferiorly. Therefore, the effect of the anterior, not anteroinferior, glenoid defect on shoulder stability needs to be investigated.
Hypothesis: The anterior glenoid defect would have a similar effect on anterior shoulder stability as that of the anteroinferior glenoid defect.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
The stability ratio without a defect (32% +/- 6%) significantly decreased after creating a 6-mm defect (17% +/- 5%; P = .0001), which was equivalent to 20% of the glenoid length.
An osseous defect at 3 o'clock with a width that was equal to or greater than 20% of the glenoid length significantly decreased anterior stability.
Clinical Relevance: The results suggest that reconstruction of the glenoid concavity might be necessary in shoulders with an anterior glenoid defect of at least 20% of the glenoid length.
Copyright remains with the authors and publisher.