To test the equivalence for clinical effectiveness between microdecompression and laminectomy in patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis.
Design: Multicentre observational study.
Setting: Prospective data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
Participants: 885 patients with central stenosis of the lumbar spine who underwent surgery at 34 Norwegian orthopaedic or neurosurgical departments. Patients were treated from October 2006 to December 2011.
Interventions: Laminectomy and microdecompression.
Main Outcome Measures:
At one year the effectiveness of microdecompression is equivalent to laminectomy in the surgical treatment of central stenosis of the lumbar spine. Favourable outcomes were observed at one year in both treatment groups.
Copyright remains with the authors and publisher.
To test the equivalence for clinical effectiveness between microdecompression and laminectomy in patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis.
Design: Multicentre observational study.
Setting: Prospective data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
Participants: 885 patients with central stenosis of the lumbar spine who underwent surgery at 34 Norwegian orthopaedic or neurosurgical departments. Patients were treated from October 2006 to December 2011.
Interventions: Laminectomy and microdecompression.
Main Outcome Measures:
At one year the effectiveness of microdecompression is equivalent to laminectomy in the surgical treatment of central stenosis of the lumbar spine. Favourable outcomes were observed at one year in both treatment groups.
Copyright remains with the authors and publisher.