The posterosuperior rotator cuff, composed of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons, is the most common site for full-thickness rotator cuff tears and represents a significant source of shoulder disability worldwide. Recognition of and classification of full-thickness tear patterns are essential in order to optimize surgical treatment and to improve prognosis. Until recently, tear patterns have been described using one- or two-dimensional classification systems. Three-dimensional pattern recognition is critical to achieving the most successful outcome possible. For more complex patterns, a combination of side-to-side stitching, margin convergence, and interval slide techniques may be needed to achieve a tension-free tendon-bone repair. Biomechanical and anatomic evidence supports the use of linked double-row repairs for most full-thickness tears. Although double-row repairs seem to result in improved structural outcomes, clinical evidence has not shown differences in outcomes scores between single-row and double-row repairs. Single-row repair may be performed in partial-thickness, small full-thickness, or very massive, immobile tears, whereas double-row repair may be performed in most other cases.
Copyright remains with the authors and publisher.
The posterosuperior rotator cuff, composed of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons, is the most common site for full-thickness rotator cuff tears and represents a significant source of shoulder disability worldwide. Recognition of and classification of full-thickness tear patterns are essential in order to optimize surgical treatment and to improve prognosis. Until recently, tear patterns have been described using one- or two-dimensional classification systems. Three-dimensional pattern recognition is critical to achieving the most successful outcome possible. For more complex patterns, a combination of side-to-side stitching, margin convergence, and interval slide techniques may be needed to achieve a tension-free tendon-bone repair. Biomechanical and anatomic evidence supports the use of linked double-row repairs for most full-thickness tears. Although double-row repairs seem to result in improved structural outcomes, clinical evidence has not shown differences in outcomes scores between single-row and double-row repairs. Single-row repair may be performed in partial-thickness, small full-thickness, or very massive, immobile tears, whereas double-row repair may be performed in most other cases.
Copyright remains with the authors and publisher.