| Predictors present | Probability of septic arthritis | Suggested workup |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | <0.2% | Observe without aspiration |
| 1 | 3.0% | No recommendation given |
| 2 | 40.0% | Aspirate under fluoroscopy or ultrasound |
| 3 | 93.1% | Aspirate in the OR, ready for arthrotomy |
| 4 | 99.6% | Aspirate in the OR, ready for arthrotomy |
Although several variables differed significantly between the group that had septic arthritis and the group that had transient synovitis, substantial overlap in the intermediate ranges made differentiation difficult on the basis of individual variables alone. However, by combining variables, we were able to construct a set of independent multivariate predictors that, together, had excellent diagnostic performance in differentiating between septic arthritis and transient synovitis of the hip in children.
| Predictors present | Probability of septic arthritis | Suggested workup |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | <0.2% | Observe without aspiration |
| 1 | 3.0% | No recommendation given |
| 2 | 40.0% | Aspirate under fluoroscopy or ultrasound |
| 3 | 93.1% | Aspirate in the OR, ready for arthrotomy |
| 4 | 99.6% | Aspirate in the OR, ready for arthrotomy |
Although several variables differed significantly between the group that had septic arthritis and the group that had transient synovitis, substantial overlap in the intermediate ranges made differentiation difficult on the basis of individual variables alone. However, by combining variables, we were able to construct a set of independent multivariate predictors that, together, had excellent diagnostic performance in differentiating between septic arthritis and transient synovitis of the hip in children.