Evidence supporting the anterior approach (AA) over the lateral approach (LA) in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fracture, while promising, is inconsistent and largely retrospective. The purpose of this study was to compare the AA to the LA for early function, time to discharge, pain, and complications in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture.
The AA is not associated with superior recovery or early-term outcomes in hip fracture patients. At present, without proven benefit, widespread adoption of the AA in this population is not recommended, particularly considering the learning curve and specialized equipment requirements.
Copyright remains with the authors and publisher.
Evidence supporting the anterior approach (AA) over the lateral approach (LA) in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fracture, while promising, is inconsistent and largely retrospective. The purpose of this study was to compare the AA to the LA for early function, time to discharge, pain, and complications in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture.
The AA is not associated with superior recovery or early-term outcomes in hip fracture patients. At present, without proven benefit, widespread adoption of the AA in this population is not recommended, particularly considering the learning curve and specialized equipment requirements.
Copyright remains with the authors and publisher.