This study introduces a 3D-CT method that digitally removes the humeral head to visualize and measure glenoid rim bone loss in recurrent anterior shoulder instability. It asks how often glenoid bone loss occurs and how to quantify it before surgery. 100 unstable shoulders were compared with 75 normal glenoids and then checked arthroscopically.
The practical model here: on 3D-CT with the humeral head subtracted, the inferior glenoid should trace a true circle. A flat or missing anteroinferior arc means bone loss, and you compare against the patient's own normal contralateral side.
The prevalence numbers change how you think preoperatively. If 90% of recurrent instability shoulders have some rim bone loss and half have a real fragment, you cannot assume a clean soft-tissue Bankart from history alone.
Size drives the plan in this paper: large fragments push toward bone-grafting, while medium and small fragments were treated with arthroscopic fixation to restore the glenoid arc. A key pitfall: arthroscopy underestimated bone loss, missing small fragments buried under the labroligamentous complex until it was released. Do not let a normal-looking scope talk you out of what CT shows.
This study introduces a 3D-CT method that digitally removes the humeral head to visualize and measure glenoid rim bone loss in recurrent anterior shoulder instability. It asks how often glenoid bone loss occurs and how to quantify it before surgery. 100 unstable shoulders were compared with 75 normal glenoids and then checked arthroscopically.
The practical model here: on 3D-CT with the humeral head subtracted, the inferior glenoid should trace a true circle. A flat or missing anteroinferior arc means bone loss, and you compare against the patient's own normal contralateral side.
The prevalence numbers change how you think preoperatively. If 90% of recurrent instability shoulders have some rim bone loss and half have a real fragment, you cannot assume a clean soft-tissue Bankart from history alone.
Size drives the plan in this paper: large fragments push toward bone-grafting, while medium and small fragments were treated with arthroscopic fixation to restore the glenoid arc. A key pitfall: arthroscopy underestimated bone loss, missing small fragments buried under the labroligamentous complex until it was released. Do not let a normal-looking scope talk you out of what CT shows.