To determine whether the procedure of unreamed femoral nailing is simpler, faster, and safer than reamed femoral intramedullary nailing.
Design: Prospective randomized.
Setting and Participants: 100 femoral shaft fractures without significant concomitant injuries admitted to an academic Level 1 urban trauma center.
Intervention: Stabilization of the femoral shaft fracture using a reamed or unreamed technique.
Outcome Measures: The surgical time, estimated blood loss, fluoroscopy time, and perioperative complications were prospectively recorded.
Unreamed femoral intramedullary nailing involves fewer steps and is significantly faster with less intraoperative blood loss than reamed intramedullary nailing. The unreamed technique, however, was associated with a higher incidence of perioperative complications, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.5).
Copyright remains with the authors and publisher.
To determine whether the procedure of unreamed femoral nailing is simpler, faster, and safer than reamed femoral intramedullary nailing.
Design: Prospective randomized.
Setting and Participants: 100 femoral shaft fractures without significant concomitant injuries admitted to an academic Level 1 urban trauma center.
Intervention: Stabilization of the femoral shaft fracture using a reamed or unreamed technique.
Outcome Measures: The surgical time, estimated blood loss, fluoroscopy time, and perioperative complications were prospectively recorded.
Unreamed femoral intramedullary nailing involves fewer steps and is significantly faster with less intraoperative blood loss than reamed intramedullary nailing. The unreamed technique, however, was associated with a higher incidence of perioperative complications, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.5).
Copyright remains with the authors and publisher.