No article notes available at this time.
• Reinforces that a 10 mm nail achieved comparable union rates to larger diameters in this cohort, supporting its use as a reasonable default rather than routinely reaming for larger implants. • Offers residents a practical rationale for selecting nail size based on fracture anatomy and canal fit rather than assuming bigger is always better — with potential downstream benefits in operative time and implant inventory. • Adds retrospective, single-center data to the ongoing discussion about nail sizing and entry point selection, though as Level III evidence it should be interpreted as one data point rather than a practice-changing mandate.
No article notes available at this time.
• Reinforces that a 10 mm nail achieved comparable union rates to larger diameters in this cohort, supporting its use as a reasonable default rather than routinely reaming for larger implants. • Offers residents a practical rationale for selecting nail size based on fracture anatomy and canal fit rather than assuming bigger is always better — with potential downstream benefits in operative time and implant inventory. • Adds retrospective, single-center data to the ongoing discussion about nail sizing and entry point selection, though as Level III evidence it should be interpreted as one data point rather than a practice-changing mandate.