Levin, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2024 - Optimizing Muscle-Tendon Lengths in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Evaluation of Surgical and Implant-Design-Related Parameters - Article Summary

Optimizing Muscle-Tendon Lengths in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Evaluation of Surgical and Implant-Design-Related Parameters

Levin, Frankle, et al.·J Bone Joint Surg Am·2024·9 citations·Biomechanical study

Background

Optimizing the function of muscles that cross the glenohumeral articulation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is controversial. The current study used a geometric model of the shoulder to systematically examine surgical placement and implant-design parameters to determine which RTSA configuration most closely reproduces native muscle-tendon lengths of the deltoid and rotator cuff.

Methods

A geometric model of the glenohumeral joint was developed and adjusted to represent small, medium, and large shoulders.
Muscle-tendon lengths were assessed for the anterior deltoid, middle deltoid, posterior deltoid, and supraspinatus from 0 to 90° of scaption; for the subscapularis from 0° to 60° of internal rotation (IR) and 0° to 60° of scaption; for the infraspinatus from 0° to 60° of external rotation (ER) and 0° to 60° of scaption; and for the teres minor from 0° to 60° of ER at 90° of scaption.
RTSA designs were virtually implanted using the following parameters: (1) surgical placement with a centered or inferior glenosphere position and a humeral offset of 0, 5, or 10 mm relative to the anatomic neck plane, (2) implant design involving a glenosphere size of 30, 36, or 42 mm, glenosphere lateralization of 0, 5, or 10 mm, and humeral neck-shaft angle of 135°, 145°, or 155°.
Thus, 486 RTSA-shoulder size combinations were analyzed.
Linear regression assessed the strength of association between parameters and the change in each muscle-tendon length from the native length.

Results

The configuration that most closely restored anatomic muscle-tendon lengths in a small shoulder was a 30-mm glenosphere with a centered position, 5 mm of glenoid lateralization, 0 mm of humeral offset, and a 135° neck-shaft angle.
For a medium shoulder, the corresponding combination was 36 mm, centered, 5 mm, 0 mm, and 135°.
For a large shoulder, it was 30 mm, centered, 10 mm, 0 mm, and 135°.
The most important implant-design parameter associated with restoration of native muscle-tendon lengths was the neck-shaft angle, with a 135° neck-shaft angle being favored (β = 0.568 to 0.657, p < 0.001).
The most important surgical parameter associated with restoration of native muscle-tendon lengths was humeral offset, with a humeral socket placed at the anatomic neck plane being favored (β = 0.441 to 0.535, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

A combination of a smaller, lateralized glenosphere, a humeral socket placed at the anatomic neck plane, and an anatomic 135° neck-shaft angle best restored native deltoid and rotator cuff muscle-tendon lengths in RTSA.

Clinical Relevance: This study of surgical and implant factors in RTSA highlighted optimal configurations for restoration of native muscle-tendon lengths of the deltoid and rotator cuff, which has direct implications for surgical technique and implant selection. Additionally, it demonstrated the most influential surgical and implant factors with respect to muscle-tendon lengths, which can be used to aid intraoperative decision-making.

Supplemental

Optimizing Muscle-Tendon Lengths in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Evaluation of Surgical and Implant-Design-Related Parameters.

Levin, Frankle, et al.J Bone Joint Surg Am20249 citationsBiomechanical study