This systematic review and meta-analysis (11 studies, 743 patients) asks whether titanium or PEEK interbody cages produce better fusion and clinical outcomes in spinal interbody fusion, with subgroup analyses separating cervical from lumbar procedures.
When planning lumbar interbody fusion in a non-infective setting, Ti cages offer a fusion rate advantage over PEEK but come with roughly twice the subsidence risk — factor endplate quality and bone density into cage material selection.
This systematic review and meta-analysis (11 studies, 743 patients) asks whether titanium or PEEK interbody cages produce better fusion and clinical outcomes in spinal interbody fusion, with subgroup analyses separating cervical from lumbar procedures.
When planning lumbar interbody fusion in a non-infective setting, Ti cages offer a fusion rate advantage over PEEK but come with roughly twice the subsidence risk — factor endplate quality and bone density into cage material selection.