The currently used system to classify the lower limb alignment (neutral, varus, valgus) does not consider the orientation of the joint line or its relationship to the overall lower limb alignment. Similarly, current total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alignment concepts do not sufficiently consider the variability of the native coronal alignment. Therefore, the purpose of this study was (1) to introduce a new classification system for the lower limb alignment, based on phenotypes, and (2) to compare the alignment targets of different TKA alignment concepts with the native alignment of non-osteoarthritic patients.
A more individualized approach to TKA alignment is needed. The functional knee phenotypes enable a simple, but detailed assessment of a patient's individual anatomy and thereby could be a helpful tool to individualize the approach to TKA.
Level of evidence: III, retrospective cohort study. Copyright remains with the authors and publisher.
The currently used system to classify the lower limb alignment (neutral, varus, valgus) does not consider the orientation of the joint line or its relationship to the overall lower limb alignment. Similarly, current total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alignment concepts do not sufficiently consider the variability of the native coronal alignment. Therefore, the purpose of this study was (1) to introduce a new classification system for the lower limb alignment, based on phenotypes, and (2) to compare the alignment targets of different TKA alignment concepts with the native alignment of non-osteoarthritic patients.
A more individualized approach to TKA alignment is needed. The functional knee phenotypes enable a simple, but detailed assessment of a patient's individual anatomy and thereby could be a helpful tool to individualize the approach to TKA.
Level of evidence: III, retrospective cohort study. Copyright remains with the authors and publisher.