A great challenge in reverse shoulder arthroplasty is the wide variation in glenoid morphology that adds uncertainties in glenoid component placement. The purpose of this study was to classify glenoid morphology and examining its effect on possible glenoid component fixation.
Discussion: Glenoid morphology of the rotator cuff deficient shoulder can be reliably classified using this classification system consisting of normal and abnormal, which included 4 subgroups of posterior, superior, global, and anterior erosions.
Abnormal glenoid morphology was shown to have a significant effect on anatomical and surgical factors which can necessitate adjustments in surgical technique for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Level of evidence: Basic Science Study. Copyright remains with the authors and publisher.
A great challenge in reverse shoulder arthroplasty is the wide variation in glenoid morphology that adds uncertainties in glenoid component placement. The purpose of this study was to classify glenoid morphology and examining its effect on possible glenoid component fixation.
Discussion: Glenoid morphology of the rotator cuff deficient shoulder can be reliably classified using this classification system consisting of normal and abnormal, which included 4 subgroups of posterior, superior, global, and anterior erosions.
Abnormal glenoid morphology was shown to have a significant effect on anatomical and surgical factors which can necessitate adjustments in surgical technique for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Level of evidence: Basic Science Study. Copyright remains with the authors and publisher.