Bottoni, Am J Sports Med 2021 - Arthroscopic versus Open Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with 15-Year Follow-Up with an Assessment of the Glenoid Being “On-Track” and “Off-Track” as a Predictor of Failure - Article Summary

Arthroscopic versus Open Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with 15-Year Follow-Up with an Assessment of the Glenoid Being “On-Track” and “Off-Track” as a Predictor of Failure

Bottoni, Thoma, et al.·Am J Sports Med·2021·36 citations·RCT

Background

Recent studies have demonstrated equivalent short-term results when comparing arthroscopic versus open anterior shoulder stabilization. However, none have evaluated the long-term clinical outcomes of patients after arthroscopic or open anterior shoulder stabilization, with inclusion of an assessment of preoperative glenoid tracking.

Purpose

To compare long-term clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability randomized to open and arthroscopic stabilization groups. Additionally, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were used to assess whether the shoulders were "on-track" or "off-track" to ascertain a prediction of increased failure risk.

Methods

Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

A consecutive series of 64 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability were randomized to receive either arthroscopic or open stabilization by a single surgeon.
Follow-up assessments were performed at minimum 15-year follow-up using established postoperative evaluations.
Clinical failure was defined as any recurrent dislocation postoperatively or subjective instability.
Preoperative MRI scans were obtained to calculate the glenoid track and designate shoulders as on-track or off-track.
These results were then correlated with the patients' clinical results at their latest follow-up.

Results

Of 64 patients, 60 (28 arthroscopic and 32 open) were contacted or examined for follow-up (range, 15-17 years).
The mean age at the time of surgery was 25 years (range, 19-42 years), while the mean age at the time of this assessment was 40 years (range, 34-57 years).
The rates of arthroscopic and open long-term failure were 14.3% (4/28) and 12.5% (4/32), respectively.
There were no differences in subjective shoulder outcome scores between the treatment groups.
Of the 56 shoulders, with available MRI studies, 8 (14.3%) were determined to be off-track.
Of these 8 shoulders, there were 2 surgical failures (25.0%; 1 treated arthroscopically, 1 treated open).
In the on-track group, 6 of 48 had failed surgery (12.5%; 3 open, 3 arthroscopic [ P = .280]).

Conclusions

Long-term clinical outcomes were comparable at 15 years postoperatively between the arthroscopic and open stabilization groups. The presence of an off-track lesion may be associated with a higher rate of recurrent instability in both cohorts at long-term follow-up; however, this study was underpowered to verify this situation.

Core

Arthroscopic versus Open Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with 15-Year Follow-Up with an Assessment of the Glenoid Being “On-Track” and “Off-Track” as a Predictor of Failure